(This is the third in a series of critiques of Rachel Held
Evans’s “A Year of Biblical Womanhood.” If you missed earlier posts, click on the
links below.)
For one year, Rachel Held Evans is trying to follow “as
literally as possible” all Old Testament and New Testament laws about women. For
example, she stayed in a tent, sat on a stadium cushion, and did not attend
church while she was having her menstrual period (see here). She calls this “biblical
womanhood.” She is seriously confused.
This post looks at another element in her confusion: God’s
temple today.
I’ve mentioned in previous posts that Evans is acting as if
there is still a temple building open for business in Jerusalem. By not going
to church during her menstrual period, she is acting as if the Mosaic rules and
regulations are in force today. As if God’s special presence in the Holy of
Holies is off limits behind temple walls and courts, up many flights of steps,
and behind curtains. Moreover, Evans is treating her particular church building
as if that were the bygone Jerusalem
temple.
Hasn’t Evans ever read that her very body is the temple of
the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19)? Doesn’t that fact make her whole exercise
in piety, um, ridiculous?
Yes.
In A.D. 70 the Romans destroyed the building in Jerusalem, but
God still has a temple here on earth. His temple is us. Everyone who believes
in Christ is a living stone in God’s spiritual temple (1 Peter 2:5), “built on
the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus being the cornerstone,
in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in
the Lord. In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for
God by the Spirit” (Ephesians 2:20–22 ESV).
Not only has Jesus “broken down in his flesh the dividing
wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments and ordinances”
(Ephesians 2: 14-15 ESV). But also we carry the special presence of God with us
everywhere we go. As Abraham Kuyper said, “… there is not a square inch in the whole domain
of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all,
does not cry: ‘Mine!’”
So what good does it do Evans to stay away from church?
Well, she hopes it will make us think all gender
distinctives in the Bible are just as ridiculous and passé as the menstrual
laws of the books of Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. In my next posts I’ll
start to deal with her real agenda—egalitarianism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Constructive comments are welcome--but all comments will be moderated, and your grammar may be improved upon. As you post, consider what you'd be willing to say in my presence, in my kitchen.